18+ only. Gambling involves risk. Play responsibly.Responsible gambling

Methodology: How We Compare CS2 Roulette Sites

Last reviewed 9 November 202618+ · Odds always favor the house

Independent. No commercial relationship with any listed company. How we work.

On this page
  1. The four-point checklist
  2. Sources and what counts as confirmed
  3. What “Editor’s order” means
  4. What a “Best for” tag is
  5. Update cadence
  6. Independence
  7. Changelog

We compare sites with a fixed checklist, show only facts we confirmed on a stated date, and publish the list in an editor’s order. No scores, weights or totals are calculated. This page describes only what was actually done.

The four-point checklist

The same four checks apply to every site. A check appears on a site’s page only if it was confirmed.

  1. Fairness. Does the site publish a provably fair scheme, and can a player verify rounds? We read the site’s own fairness page and note the method. See provably fair verification steps.
  2. Operator and licence. Operator name, registration and licence as the site itself states them, plus regional restrictions it publishes. We report them as stated.
  3. Roulette. Wheel layout, payouts and the resulting house edge. We calculate the edge only when both the slot count and the payouts are published. See odds and house edge.
  4. Payments. Deposit and withdrawal methods, fees and verification steps stated in the site’s own terms and help pages. See deposits and withdrawals.

Sources and what counts as confirmed

A fact counts as confirmed when we read it on the site’s own pages (home page, footer, terms, fairness page, help centre), in a web browser, on the date shown. Facts from affiliate review sites, directories and forums are not used as evidence for what appears here.

Where a fact was missing or contradictory, we left it out rather than guess. Comparison tables contain only attributes confirmed for all six sites; site-specific facts appear in that site’s review.

What “Editor’s order” means

The list is in editor’s order, and that order is based on this methodology: every site is assessed on the same four checks, with the same template, the same space and real cons, and the editors then set the sequence. The sequence is an editorial judgement, not a calculated score. We do not compute numeric ratings, weights or totals. Read the ranking with that in mind and compare the facts yourself.

What a “Best for” tag is

Each site carries one short factual tag, such as “Largest game library”, which must be supported by a confirmed fact in its review. Tag colours use item-rarity colours decoratively and carry no ranking meaning.

Update cadence

We re-check ranking data monthly and show the date on every page. The current data was last checked on . If a site changes its terms or wheel between checks, the page may be out of date; use the corrections process to tell us.

Independence

We have no commercial relationship with any company we list. The site has no referral links, promo codes, advertising or paid placements. Outbound links go to each site’s plain home page, without tracking parameters. If we ever add referral links or paid placements, we will disclose it on every affected page before it goes live.

Changelog

  • : first publication. Operator, licence, wheel, fairness, and payments checked on the six sites’ own pages. Where a site’s details differed from earlier public descriptions, the site’s own statement was used.

Reviews that use this method

Guides relied on: provably fair, odds and house edge, deposits and withdrawals, legal and safety and bonuses.